blog.arithm » Web 2.0 http://blog.arithm.com Software. Politics. Tinfoil hat conjecture. Thu, 02 Sep 2010 02:33:58 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9 en hourly 1 readonly versus disabledhttp://blog.arithm.com/2008/04/10/readonly-versus-disabled/ http://blog.arithm.com/2008/04/10/readonly-versus-disabled/#comments Thu, 10 Apr 2008 04:03:10 +0000 nurikabe http://blog.arithm.com/2008/04/10/readonly-versus-disabled/ I couldn’t seem to find a good breakdown on this anywhere and had to see what would happen trial and error.

  • readonly="1" will show a standard form element, however it will not be editable. Data will, however, be submitted.
  • disabled="1" will gray-out the form element. Data will not be submitted with the rest of the form.

At least, this is what Firefox does.

]]> http://blog.arithm.com/2008/04/10/readonly-versus-disabled/feed/ 0 Silverlight… would appear to suck.http://blog.arithm.com/2007/11/20/silverlight-would-appear-to-suck/ http://blog.arithm.com/2007/11/20/silverlight-would-appear-to-suck/#comments Wed, 21 Nov 2007 02:37:27 +0000 nurikabe http://blog.arithm.com/2007/11/20/silverlight-would-appear-to-suck/ Maybe I’m completely missing the boat here, but Microsoft’s new Silverlight seems to be little more than a cheesy Flash knock-off, minus the standards, supporting technologies, install base, and developer community.

What the heck is Microsoft thinking? Why didn’t they just buy Macromedia like the rumor mill has been threatening for the last half a dozen years? For that matter, why didn’t they release it bundled with Vista so that there would at least be an instant user base?

Unless Redmond does something sneaky, like pushing out Silverlight in automatic service packs, I just don’t see it achieving any market penetration for a long time.. if ever.

]]> http://blog.arithm.com/2007/11/20/silverlight-would-appear-to-suck/feed/ 0