Comments on: Subversion Reversion http://blog.arithm.com/2008/04/06/subversion-reversion/ Software. Politics. Tinfoil hat conjecture. Mon, 30 Jan 2012 09:08:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: nurikabe http://blog.arithm.com/2008/04/06/subversion-reversion/comment-page-1/#comment-739 nurikabe Mon, 07 Apr 2008 20:34:06 +0000 http://blog.arithm.com/2008/04/06/subversion-reversion/#comment-739 Yeah, we're actually just sweeping crazy things under the rug to keep the madness at bay. I think it may too late though. Yeah, we’re actually just sweeping crazy things under the rug to keep the madness at bay.

I think it may too late though.

]]> By: Chris http://blog.arithm.com/2008/04/06/subversion-reversion/comment-page-1/#comment-737 Chris Mon, 07 Apr 2008 16:41:18 +0000 http://blog.arithm.com/2008/04/06/subversion-reversion/#comment-737 Yeah, merge is fine for this. The head:56 means it's actually applying a reverse diff (because head >= 56). At first I thought you wanted to obliterate the change even from the repository history.. surprisingly, can sorta be done with svnadmin dump, but that way lies madness. Particularly if you're actually collaborating with other folks' working copies. Yeah, merge is fine for this. The head:56 means it’s actually applying a reverse diff (because head >= 56).

At first I thought you wanted to obliterate the change even from the repository history.. surprisingly, can sorta be done with svnadmin dump, but that way lies madness. Particularly if you’re actually collaborating with other folks’ working copies.

]]>